Length, breadth, thickness.
4 : 2 : 1.
Class 9 · Maths · Chapter 5 · बिहार बोर्ड (BSEB)CBSE · NCERT 2026-27
Introduction to Euclid's Geometry
How to use this page:
1. Read — History · definitions · seven axioms · five postulates · Theorem 5.1 · Exercise 5.1 · forms of the fifth · Exercise 5.2, diagram, worked example, board tip
2. Check — each lesson has its own questions; the number follows the lesson
3. Mastery ★ — all of that lesson correct. Redo the wrong ones
4. The memory figure shows a point, a ray, and a line running both ways, each with its own name.
In the 15-chapter Bihar book this is chapter 5. Ganita Manjari 2026-27 uses a different order. Progress stays in this browser.
Last 7 days:
Everything is saved in this phone/browser — no login.
This chapter has no Short on the channel yet, so ten empty cards are not shown. The notes, diagrams and checks are complete.
ज्यामिति माप से निकली, फिर कारण माँगा · Textbook 5.1 · India and Greece
“Geometry” comes from Greek words for earth and for measuring. The Nile floods wiped field boundaries, so Egypt built rules for area. In India the streets of the Indus valley were parallel and the brick ratio was found to be 4 : 2 : 1. The Sulbasutras are manuals for altars and fireplaces. The sriyantra weaves nine isosceles triangles into 43 smaller ones.
There the results were stated, not the reason for every step. In Greece, Thales gave the first known proof that a diameter bisects a circle. Around 300 BCE Euclid arranged the known work in the thirteen books of the Elements.
Question: A brick is in the ratio 4 : 2 : 1 and the length is 20 cm. Find the breadth and the thickness.
Ratio: length : breadth : thickness = 4 : 2 : 1
Substitution: 4 parts = 20 cm, so 1 part = 5 cm. Breadth = 2 × 5 = 10 cm. Thickness = 1 × 5 = 5 cm.
In a history answer do not write only Greece. The Indus valley and the Sulbasutras are in this chapter too.
The proof of Thales is about a diameter and a circle. Pythagoras is named as his pupil. Do not swap the names.
Length, breadth, thickness.
4 : 2 : 1.
False — they are geometrical construction manuals of ancient India.
Each one is called a book.
Thirteen.
A circle and its diameter.
A diameter cuts a circle into two equal parts.
The Indus valley had parallel streets and bricks in the ratio 4 : 2 : 1. The Sulbasutras describe the construction of altars. In Greece, Thales and Euclid pressed for the reason and the proof of a statement.
जो परिभाषाएँ पुस्तक अभी भी छापती है · Textbook 5.2 · point · line · plane
The book still prints these statements of Euclid. A point is that which has no part. A line is length without breadth. The ends of a line are points. A straight line lies evenly with the points on it. A surface has only length and breadth. The edges of a surface are lines. A plane surface lies evenly with the straight lines on it.
In these sentences, part, breadth and “evenly” themselves ask for definitions. So a point, a line and a plane are undefined today. A solid has three dimensions, a surface two, a line one, and a point none. In a figure a point is a dot, even though a dot has size.
Question: Why is “a line is length without breadth” not accepted as a definition today?
Answer: Length and breadth are not defined before this sentence. Explaining one word needs a definition of another, and the chain does not stop. So a line is left undefined and the work is done with its picture and the axioms.
If the question says “give the definition”, write the line from the book, and in the next line say that today these are taken as undefined. Do not leave one side out.
Do not merge a ray and a line in one figure. A ray has one end. A line runs without an end both ways.
Three geometric words.
A point, a line and a plane.
False — “that which has no part” is still in the chapter. The stand today is that it is undefined.
A surface has two, a point has zero.
1.
The old printed line.
Lines.
False — a dot has some size. It is only a picture of a point.
A point is that which has no part. A line is length without breadth. Today a point and a line are taken as undefined, because the words in these lines themselves ask for definitions.
सात सामान्य धारणाएँ · Textbook 5.2 · axioms
The book gives the axioms of Euclid, not in his order, in this form. Things equal to the same thing are equal to one another. If equals are added to equals, the wholes are equal. If equals are subtracted from equals, the remainders are equal. Things that coincide are equal. The whole is greater than the part. Doubles of the same thing are equal. Halves of the same thing are equal.
The fourth axiom is the base of superposition. The fifth gives the meaning of “greater”: A > B means there is some C with A = B + C. Magnitudes of different kinds are not added. A line is not added to a rectangle, and an angle is not compared with a pentagon.
Question: AB = PQ and PQ = XY. What is the relation of AB and XY? Which axiom?
Answer: Both are equal to the same length PQ, so AB = XY. This is the first axiom. The unit stays the same on both sides: if both are 5 cm, then AB is also 5 cm.
“The whole is greater than the part” is the fifth common notion, not the fifth postulate. When a number is asked, write the name too.
Do not put a line and an area in one sum. Only magnitudes of the same kind are added.
The first common notion.
Equal to one another.
False — the whole is greater than the part. That is the fifth common notion.
Superposition rests on this.
Equal.
The kinds differ.
A line and a rectangle are magnitudes of different kinds.
If equals are added to equals, the wholes are equal, so A + C = B + D. Example: 3 cm + 2 cm = 5 cm, and 3 cm + 2 cm on the other side is also 5 cm.
पाँच अभिधारणाएँ और अद्वितीय रेखा · Textbook 5.2 · postulates · Axiom 5.1
First: a straight line may be drawn from any point to any other point. This says “at least one”. The book states Axiom 5.1 separately: exactly one line passes through two distinct points. Second: a terminated segment can be extended both ways. What Euclid called a terminated line is called a line segment today. Third: a circle may be drawn with any centre and any radius. Fourth: all right angles are equal.
The fifth is long. If a straight line falls on two straight lines so that the interior angles on the same side add to less than two right angles, then the lines, if extended, meet on that side. Beside the first four, this one is neither short nor immediately plain. It still could not be proved from the rest, so it stayed a postulate.
Question: P and Q are two distinct points. How many straight lines pass through them?
Answer: By Axiom 5.1, exactly one, the line PQ. The first postulate alone does not say “only one”. The same line is the only one from Q toward P as well.
In the answer “two points, one line”, write the number Axiom 5.1. The first postulate alone stays incomplete.
All right angles are equal. That is the fourth postulate. The measure 90° is a later agreement. The postulate is not a table of measures.
The book adds it separately.
Axiom 5.1. Postulate 1 only says a line may be drawn.
True — extending it both ways makes a line. That is the second postulate.
The third postulate.
A circle.
The circle is the third.
The fourth postulate.
False — the book says it is far more complex than they are.
The first postulate says a straight line may be drawn through two points. Axiom 5.1 adds that through two distinct points such a line is exactly one.
प्रमेय 5.1 और रेखाखंड का योग · Textbook 5.2 · Theorem 5.1 · Exercise 5.1
A statement proved from the axioms is a theorem. Euclid deduced 465 theorems in his chain. Theorem 5.1: two distinct lines cannot have more than one point in common. If two points were common, two lines would pass through those same two points, against Axiom 5.1.
If B lies between A and C, then AC coincides with AB together with BC. Things that coincide are equal, so AB + BC = AC. An equilateral triangle is constructed from the third postulate: two circles with centres A and B and radius AB, and the meeting point C.
Question: B lies between A and C. AB = 4 cm and BC = 5 cm. Find AC.
Relation: AB + BC = AC, because AC coincides with the two segments together.
Substitution: AC = 4 cm + 5 cm = 9 cm.
In Theorem 5.1 write “at most one”. “Exactly one” can be wrong, because parallel lines do not meet.
AB + BC = AC only when B is between. Mark the between-point on the figure.
10-second revision
It clashes with the unique line.
Not more than one point in common.
True — from the common notion about coincidence.
Four hundred and sixty-five.
465.
AC = AB + BC = 6 cm + 3 cm = 9 cm. This comes from the common notion of coincidence and the result about a point lying between.
पाँचवीं अभिधारणा के तुल्य रूप · Textbook 5.3 · Exercise 5.2
Attempts to prove the fifth from the first four failed. The failure produced several other geometries, called non-Euclidean. The book gives two equivalent forms. The first, Playfair’s: for every line l and every point P not on it, exactly one line m passes through P and is parallel to l. The second: two distinct intersecting lines cannot both be parallel to the same line.
A system of axioms is consistent when no statement deduced from it contradicts an axiom or a statement already proved. Today the words axiom and postulate are also used in the same sense.
Question: Point P is not on line l. How many lines through P can be drawn parallel to l?
Answer: By the Playfair form, exactly one. This is equivalent to the fifth postulate, not a separate new rule. Draw two, and they will meet each other or both will not stay parallel to l.
Do not call Playfair a new postulate. Write that it is one of the forms equivalent to the fifth.
A consistent system does not mean “an easy system”. It means no inner contradiction is deduced.
10-second revision
Playfair.
Exactly one. This is equivalent to the fifth.
False — the attempts failed. Non-Euclidean geometries opened from that.
No contradiction.
Consistent.
The second equivalent form.
They cannot both be parallel to the same line.
First: exactly one parallel through a point outside a line. Second: two distinct intersecting lines cannot both be parallel to the same line. Non-Euclidean geometries grew from the failed proofs.
Pick a type. The 31 lesson checks are separate — each lesson has as many as its topic needs. All correct earns mastery ★.
No question is marked as a verified past paper. The BSEB set is a model for practice. CBSE items are CBSE-style, not a copy of any year’s paper.
465 is the count of theorems.
13.
Length is the largest.
4 : 2 : 1.
The old lines stay printed.
A point, a line and a plane.
A point has zero, a surface two.
1.
A postulate belongs to geometry.
The fifth common notion.
Any centre, any radius.
The third postulate.
Axiom 5.1.
Exactly one.
Meeting at one point is allowed.
Not more than one common point.
The Playfair form.
Exactly one.
The first four were not enough.
From the failed proofs.
No clash.
No deduced contradiction.
The fourth common notion.
Things that coincide are equal.
The two pieces make the whole.
AB + BC.
True — it is taken as the first known proof.
False — a point is undefined. The line is printed in the book as the old wording.
False — a line and a rectangle do not go into one sum.
False — uniqueness is stated separately in Axiom 5.1.
True — the fourth postulate.
False — Theorem 5.1 forbids more than one common point.
True — exactly one parallel from an outside point.
False — an axiom is accepted without proof. A theorem is proved.
13.
The theorems are 465.
0.
A line has one.
A circle.
Any centre, any radius.
1.
Axiom 5.1.
9.
4 + 5.
1.
Playfair.
Consistent.
Not a synonym of easy.
465.
The books are 13.
Right angles are a postulate, the whole is a common notion, the common point is the theorem, and the point line is the old definition.
13 books, 465 theorems, 5.1 the unique line, and a surface has two dimensions.
Assertion (A): Exactly one line passes through two distinct points.
Reason (R): Axiom 5.1 states this uniqueness separately.
Both are true and R is the correct reason.
Assertion (A): A point is undefined today.
Reason (R): All right angles are equal.
Both are true, but R does not explain why a point is undefined.
Assertion (A): AB + BC = AC when B is between A and C.
Reason (R): The length of a line and the area of a rectangle are put in the same sum.
A is true. R is false — magnitudes of different kinds are not added.
Assertion (A): The fifth postulate has been proved from the first four.
Reason (R): Non-Euclidean geometries opened from the failed attempts.
A is false. R is true.
Assertion (A): Two distinct lines cannot share three points.
Reason (R): Even two shared points would clash with Axiom 5.1.
Both are true and R explains Theorem 5.1.
The whole is an axiom. Right angles and the circle are postulates. The common point is Theorem 5.1.
The brick and the Sulbasutras belong to India. Thirteen books belong to the Elements. One parallel is Playfair.
A statement proved from definitions, axioms and earlier proved statements is a theorem.
Exactly one line passes through two distinct points.
Two distinct lines cannot have more than one point in common.
All right angles are equal to one another.
Exactly one line parallel to a given line passes through a point outside it.
AC = 7 cm + 2 cm = 9 cm. Things that coincide are equal, and the between-point makes the two segments into the whole.
A point is that which has no part. “Part” itself asks for a definition, so the chain does not stop. Today a point is undefined.
A line may be drawn through two points. A segment may be extended both ways. A circle may be drawn with any centre and radius. All right angles are equal.
Things equal to the same thing are equal. Things that coincide are equal. The whole is greater than the part. A line and a rectangle are different kinds, so they are not added. AB and PQ are both 5 cm, so AB = PQ.
Postulate 1 says a line may be drawn. Axiom 5.1 says it is exactly one. If two lines shared two points, two lines would pass through those two points, against 5.1. So there is not more than one common point.
If the interior angles on one side of a transversal add to less than 180°, the lines meet on that side. Equivalent forms: exactly one parallel from an outside point, and two intersecting lines are not both parallel to the same line. When it could not be proved from the first four, non-Euclidean geometries opened.
This model set is for practice. It is not a question from any year’s annual examination. Annual questions will be added only when a source page is available.
Postulate 1 is not enough.
Axiom 5.1.
A line has one, a solid three.
2.
Between.
At an end the sum is not this.
False — this is against the second form equivalent to the fifth.
4 parts = 12 cm, so 1 part = 3 cm. The breadth is 6 cm and the thickness is 3 cm.
These are competency-based practice questions. They are not copies of a CBSE paper.
Uniqueness is a separate axiom.
Axiom 5.1 says exactly one line.
Theorem 5.1.
Two distinct lines do not have more than one point in common.
Assertion (A): Extending a segment both ways gives a line.
Reason (R): This extension is Theorem 5.1.
A is true, the second postulate. R is false — 5.1 is about a common point.
False — consistent means no contradiction is deduced from the system.
The two pegs are two distinct points. Axiom 5.1 says exactly one line passes through them, so the straight boundary is drawn in only one way. The first postulate only says that a line may be drawn.
Magnitudes of different kinds are not added. An angle and a length are not one sum. A correct sum is 4 cm + 5 cm = 9 cm, or 30° + 60° = 90°.
Switch board with BSEB | CBSE above. The lessons follow the same NCERT chapter.
This page has no verified annual-exam question, because no source page has been added. The model set below is practice in the board pattern.
🏛️ Model questions on one page →
The verified label will be used only when a source page for the question is available.
These are case and assertion-reason practice items. Do not treat them as past CBSE questions.
Wrong questions return soon; correct ones return after a few days.
What you learned
| What | Keep this |
|---|---|
| Undefined | point, line, plane |
| Axioms | seven common notions |
| Postulates 1–4 | line, extension, circle, right angles |
| Postulate 5 | lines meet if interior sum < 180° |
| Axiom 5.1 | unique line through two points |
| Theorem 5.1 | at most one common point |
The notes are original writing. The textbook was used only for activity order and numbers. “Verified” will be used only on a question that has a source page.